Mile 0

Joined

• started 6 topics
• posted 53 times   see topics posted on
• send a message

Posts by Mile 0

• 
  46

  I did it! and it's your fault

  by Hortensia in

  1. jw
  2. experiences

  i went to the grocery store today - no that's not your fault.. it's 103 degrees today, not bad.

  there were three people sitting in the shade in front of the grocery store.

  there was a middle aged woman, an older man in a wheelchair, and a thin man whose frozen smile screams "elder.

  1. 
  2. 
  3. 
• 

  Mile 0

  Good on you!

  Mile 0
• 
  42

  Did you have to dress up for meeting?

  by ericr in

  1. jw
  2. friends

  i remember having to dress up for every meeting even the ones during the week.

  i had to wear a botton down shirt dress pants, a tie, dress shoes, dress socks and a blazer.

  this was also required by my parents to dress up when going door to door.

  1. 
  2. 
  3. 
• 

  Mile 0

  My day was going JUST PERFECTLY FINE until you ressurected those awful memories...

  For a few years the Tuesday book study was at our house. We were cut some slack for that meeting - we could drop the blazer & tie. At the KH meetings, however, Mom showed no mercy. On the hottest of days, we could remove the blazer BUT could not drop the tie and undo the collar button. None of the KH's I went to had air conditioning.

  Field service sucked. On hot summer day I showed up for field sevice with short pants, short sleeve dress shirt, and sandals. One of the elders bitched me out about it. He was dressed in full assault mode, with sweat drippng off the end of his nose. What a moron.

  Mile 0
• 
  10

  Sanctity of Blood

  by Mile 0 in

  1. watchtower
  2. medical

  this is why i believe the wts is so totally wrong on the blood issue.

  blood, as it circulates through a living organism, is merely a bodily fluid.

  it does not take on any special significance until that organism expires.

  1. 
  2. 
  3. 
• 

  Mile 0

  Hello Gopher, you're right. Those old feelings about blood transfusions took awhile to shake. I think a common thread is the fact that once you leave the WTS, you gradually start seeing various doctrinal issues in a more objective light. Without WT blinders on, one can allow themselves to actually think about what Bible writers were actually trying to say. And the best way to figure this out is to frame these issues in the context of life in those times. Then it becomes very clear. The average Jew or early Christian would have thought "the use of blood" to be associated with the the pagan rituals of other cultures they knew about. And the use of blood almost always involved the death of something or somebody. The requirement to properly bleed the animal before eating it is fairly straightforward; the blood is symbolic of the life that was taken for sustainance. The restriction against eating the blood of a slaughtered animal was just a simple acknowledgement of that.

  Mile 0
• 
  10

  Sanctity of Blood

  by Mile 0 in

  1. watchtower
  2. medical

  this is why i believe the wts is so totally wrong on the blood issue.

  blood, as it circulates through a living organism, is merely a bodily fluid.

  it does not take on any special significance until that organism expires.

  1. 
  2. 
  3. 
• 

  Mile 0

  Hi Awakened, it took me some time after leaving the org to gain some objectivity on the medical use of blood; even after having been out for years, I was still thinking in terms of it's negative aspects only. The idea of eating something like blood pudding or sausage still repels me, but I know a lot of non-JWs who feel the same way. The only real issue has always been medical.

  Mile 0
• 
  10

  Sanctity of Blood

  by Mile 0 in

  1. watchtower
  2. medical

  this is why i believe the wts is so totally wrong on the blood issue.

  blood, as it circulates through a living organism, is merely a bodily fluid.

  it does not take on any special significance until that organism expires.

  1. 
  2. 
  3. 
• 

  Mile 0

  I think you're right, stevenyc. The WTS has misrepresented scripture on more than one level. They don't take into account that in the context of life back then; Jewish religious leaders no doubt had in mind the use of blood in various rituals practiced by neighboring nations. If Bible writers were speaking to the reality of Jewish life during that time, this could have easily been implied without specifying because outside of pagan rituals and the notions of special powers attributed to drinking the blood of certain animals, there were no other "uses" for blood.

  Mile 0
• 
  10

  Sanctity of Blood

  by Mile 0 in

  1. watchtower
  2. medical

  this is why i believe the wts is so totally wrong on the blood issue.

  blood, as it circulates through a living organism, is merely a bodily fluid.

  it does not take on any special significance until that organism expires.

  1. 
  2. 
  3. 
• 

  Mile 0

  This is why I believe the WTS is so totally wrong on the blood issue.

  Blood, as it circulates through a living organism, is merely a bodily fluid. It does not take on any special significance until that organism expires. Then the blood becomes the symbol of the life that this organism had. As it relates to food, the Biblical requirement to properly bleed the animal was simply a gesture to acknowledge the life that the animal gave up in order to sustain human life. As this relates to blood transfusions, the same restrictions do not apply because death of the donar isn't part of the proccess.

  Mile 0
• 
  34

  What would happen if?

  by ninja in

  1. jw
  2. friends

  siamese twins became jehovah's witnesses and one became apostate???

  ?....what problems would be caused?

  ?...or what would happen if one was anointed?...

  1. 
  2. 
  3. 
• 

  Mile 0

  LOL ,

  or if one liked incest and the other didn't...

  Mile 0
• 
  7

  Welcome New Ones To The Forum

  by Quandry in

  1. social
  2. current

  sometimes i don't have time to look at all the new posts, and i miss some of the new posters, like king tut and others.

  if you are new here, i just wanted to say welcome to the forum.

  it is always great to have new ones and read your stories.

  1. 
  2. 
  3. 
• 

  Mile 0

  Big thanks for the welcome!

  Mile 0
• 
  6

  Duke Vindicates Jehovah's Ways

  by Justitia Themis in

  1. social
  2. current

  i found this on the "e-watchman exposed" db.

  the post speaks for (or against) itself.

  the duke case is a tragedy, but is certainly does not argue for the "two-witness" rule.

  1. 
  2. 
  3. 
• 

  Mile 0

  "It is so evident that those who make accusations against Jehovah's organization are not being fair and honest on matters."

  I went over to "watchman exposed" and it's the same old JW twaddle. OUR WAYS ARE JEHOVAH"S WAYS...

  Those who make accusations against the WTS can clearly see the difference.

  Mile 0
• 
  6

  Duke Vindicates Jehovah's Ways

  by Justitia Themis in

  1. social
  2. current

  i found this on the "e-watchman exposed" db.

  the post speaks for (or against) itself.

  the duke case is a tragedy, but is certainly does not argue for the "two-witness" rule.

  1. 
  2. 
  3. 
• 

  Mile 0

  Bottom line - the cops have the expertise and resources to properly investigate. One can never discount the possibility of false claims by a "victim", but again, that's what investigators sort out.

  mile 0